In an attempt to keep on top of the archives/RM 2.0 debate (mainly for my own benefit), there are a couple of things I've missed in my recent posts that I should have noted.

Jane Stevenson of the
Archives Hub posted her thoughts on the ArchivesNext post that triggered much of the debate on the archives side of things here. Gordon Belt of the Posterity Project blog has also rounded up some useful links in this post.

I should also mention the
social network that Steve established on Ning to discuss ideas around the term Records Management 2.0 with colleagues.

EDIT:
David has tracked down another post on archives 2.0 from New Zealand and linked to it here.

2 Comments